Mikey1874 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 (edited) Andrew Dallas evidence probably will help us given it was nothing and over quickly and he will have seen worse. Or he is really is a tube. Edited December 10, 2018 by Mikey1874 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadj Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said: Andrew Dallas evidence probably will help us given it was nothing and over quickly and he will have seen worse. Or he is really is a tube. Dallas isnt able to ref games at this level as has been proven regularly did that have an effect? Id say yes to a degree but that can’t be admitted by the SFA so chances are they will back their man and his lunacy and make examples of Hearts and Hibs.... South of Scotland league after Christmas it is..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All roads lead to Gorgie Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 23 minutes ago, Barack said: Both thrown out the league. Examples must be made. That would be tremendous news. Thrown out a tinpot league and no more Bobby Maddens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, sadj said: Dallas isnt able to ref games at this level as has been proven regularly did that have an effect? Id say yes to a degree but that can’t be admitted by the SFA so chances are they will back their man and his lunacy and make examples of Hearts and Hibs.... South of Scotland league after Christmas it is..... The thing that would bother me is if we get a big fine when 1. It was nothing 2. Biggest actual fine for this offence has been £300 (with £150 suspended) which was a rammy where 3 players were sent off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 There was a bigger rammy after Arfield tried to decapitate Bobby. Is the lack of action because Sevco were involved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Just now, Rudolf said: There was a bigger rammy after Arfield tried to decapitate Bobby. Is the lack of action because Sevco were involved? Tough question to answer that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Rudolf said: There was a bigger rammy after Arfield tried to decapitate Bobby. Is the lack of action because Sevco were involved? They don't have a time limit on taking action Waiting to see how Rangers v Celtic game before New Year goes Edited December 10, 2018 by Mikey1874 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avhudtheteeshirt Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 3 hours ago, Rudolf said: There was a bigger rammy after Arfield tried to decapitate Bobby. Is the lack of action because Sevco were involved? If any action was to take place it would be Hearts in the dock again, as it was our players who took Arfield into the back of the net!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunks Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Case not proven - no punishment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooperstar Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 https://stv.tv/amp/1433627-hearts-and-hibs-face-no-action-over-derby-flashpoint/?__twitter_impression=true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjcc Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Obviously not wanting several pointless cases like this heard every week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnthomas Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Sooperstar said: https://stv.tv/amp/1433627-hearts-and-hibs-face-no-action-over-derby-flashpoint/?__twitter_impression=true Think this was always a given . They had to look as though they were doing 'something' . Even given any problems at the game had heehaw to do with this cited incident Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomaso Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 50 minutes ago, avhudtheteeshirt said: If any action was to take place it would be Hearts in the dock again, as it was our players who took Arfield into the back of the net!!!! after Arnfield had kicked our keeper into the back of the net..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 "Dismissed" is the term used. https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/ Waste of time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redm Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 3 hours ago, Mikey1874 said: "Dismissed" is the term used. https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/ Waste of time Bet Craig was thrilled to be dragged all the way through to Hampden for that. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 26 minutes ago, redm said: Bet Craig was thrilled to be dragged all the way through to Hampden for that. ? Yeah. I always think that. Whole day lost. No wonder for example he says contract talk start after the games are finished for winter break. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Boy Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 It’s farcical that it went this far. Seriously, how random was that? An incident that happens every single week and often far worse... why was this brought before the SFA? ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Notts1874 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 On 22/11/2018 at 22:18, MoncurMacdonaldMercer said: sometimes you need to put your hands up and admit you were wrong we should be heavily punished for this and will hopefully accept whatever sanctions with the dignity befitting heart of Midlothian craig leveins a passionate man buts he's setting a really bad example here there was a family near me in the wheatfield who were quite upset by the players conduct I don't think they would be the only one either Your thoughts today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Glib and Shameless Crier said: It’s farcical that it went this far. Seriously, how random was that? An incident that happens every single week and often far worse... why was this brought before the SFA? ? The thing is, what they alleged is true, it did happen. There was a confrontation and at least three players from each side were involved. So once charges were brought (which I don't agree with, I don't like such a simplistic rule) how could they be dismissed when we all saw it happen? I don't get what's happened here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Boy Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Smithee said: The thing is, what they alleged is true, it did happen. There was a confrontation and at least three players from each side were involved. So once charges were brought (which I don't agree with, I don't like such a simplistic rule) how could they be dismissed when we all saw it happen? I don't get what's happened here. There is clearly something else going on in the background. As you say, they were doing what they were charged with. The questions are: 1) why was this case brought in front of the SFA and not all the others? 2) why was it dropped? You have to look at other issues that are taking place right now and see if there’s a connection. Lots of coverage about how refs are getting abused at the moment... there was a story about it on Reporting Scotland. You have to think there’s something more to all of this, and something is in the pipeline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saxondale Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 8 hours ago, Notts1874 said: Your thoughts today? Im sure he was on the wind up, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 9 hours ago, Notts1874 said: Your thoughts today? Think it was as sarcasm. Completely pointless excercise. Imagine incidents like this getting reported every week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVB Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 10 hours ago, Glib and Shameless Crier said: There is clearly something else going on in the background. As you say, they were doing what they were charged with. The questions are: 1) why was this case brought in front of the SFA and not all the others? 2) why was it dropped? You have to look at other issues that are taking place right now and see if there’s a connection. Lots of coverage about how refs are getting abused at the moment... there was a story about it on Reporting Scotland. You have to think there’s something more to all of this, and something is in the pipeline. I am guessing but Hibs seem to have lawyers who are very on the ball given the lack of punishment for them in the past. I suspect that they outwitted the SFA as per usual and as we were accused of the same offence we got off as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
...a bit disco Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 1 hour ago, DVB said: I am guessing but Hibs seem to have lawyers who are very on the ball given the lack of punishment for them in the past. I suspect that they outwitted the SFA as per usual and as we were accused of the same offence we got off as well. You're not taking The Petrie Influence into account though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 12 hours ago, Smithee said: The thing is, what they alleged is true, it did happen. There was a confrontation and at least three players from each side were involved. So once charges were brought (which I don't agree with, I don't like such a simplistic rule) how could they be dismissed when we all saw it happen? I don't get what's happened here. "Involved" as they were all on the park Only really 1 player was in any way aggressive which was Jimmy Dunne and again any tough tackle or foul will get a reaction from team mates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 2 hours ago, DVB said: I am guessing but Hibs seem to have lawyers who are very on the ball given the lack of punishment for them in the past. I suspect that they outwitted the SFA as per usual and as we were accused of the same offence we got off as well. It was because there was nothing in the incident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redm Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 Maybe they just realised it's a really stupid rule and too silly to apply in any practical or sensible way. Wouldn't surprise me if we just didn't hear about rule 204 ever again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Herbertson Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 (edited) Surely this daft ruling should be coming up again. Celtic and Rangers must be charged be charged with confrontation. The incident was far more serious and.toxic.than our wee squabble. Or am I being naive? Edited April 2, 2019 by Craig Herbertson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownkg Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Craig Herbertson said: Surely this daft ruling should be coming up again. Celtic and Rangers must be charged be charged with confrontation. The incident was far more serious and.toxic.than our wee squabble. Or am I being naive? It is good to still be an optimist at your age Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Craig Herbertson said: Surely this daft ruling should be coming up again. Celtic and Rangers must be charged be charged with confrontation. The incident was far more serious and.toxic.than our wee squabble. Or am I being naive? Craig. I think your last sentence is spot on. That they won't be charged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasavallan Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 17 minutes ago, Craig Herbertson said: Surely this daft ruling should be coming up again. Celtic and Rangers must be charged be charged with confrontation. The incident was far more serious and.toxic.than our wee squabble. Or am I being naive? Ross Co and ICT both fined £2500 for being in breach of Rule 204 during their SC game in February. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaggy2 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 Four bookings as a result of our stramash on Saturday and only one booking (that I know of) after Sunday’s absolute free for all. Guaranteed that if they get done, Hearts and Aberdeen will receive at least the same punishment, possibly more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 2 hours ago, Shaggy2 said: Four bookings as a result of our stramash on Saturday and only one booking (that I know of) after Sunday’s absolute free for all. Guaranteed that if they get done, Hearts and Aberdeen will receive at least the same punishment, possibly more. And that was worse than Hearts v Hibs which was just Jimmy Dunne running in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.