Jump to content

Vanecek Signs Pre-Contract


El Diez

Recommended Posts

Cruyff Turn
1 minute ago, Mikey1874 said:

Can't see how this means Lafferty is away. Naismith was used deeper and we haven't replaced Goncalves. MacLean is back up and Uche is a punt.

 

This would take the squad closer to being better able to challenge. 

Might do but if we get this lad, he won't be coming in to sit on the bench. So its Lafferty & Vanecek together or Laffertys offski.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 882
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Escobar PHM

    31

  • Agentjambo

    31

  • Jambof3tornado

    28

  • Fubar_Stef

    28

2 minutes ago, Cruyff Turn said:

Might do but if we get this lad, he won't be coming in to sit on the bench. So its Lafferty & Vanecek together or Laffertys offski.

 

Its Lafferty and Vanecek hopefully.

 

Then MacLean and Uche are back up which would be a normal set up.

 

(As I said Naismith is deeper) 

Edited by Mikey1874
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jambojay84
4 minutes ago, WeeChuck'sHeed said:

:mmtaxi:

Ok mate my apologies was only being friendly as I thought you were being genuine, back to not posting on here for me I guess 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The White Cockade
13 minutes ago, iantjambo said:

 

So long

 

fairwell

 

auf wiedersehen

 

goodbye

 

 

:D

:clyay:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bridge of Djoum
15 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said:

Can't see how this means Lafferty is away. Naismith was used deeper and we haven't replaced Goncalves. MacLean is back up and Uche is a punt.

 

This would take the squad closer to being better able to challenge. 

Bit harsh, mate.

 

oh..punt. Gotcha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

scott herbertson
5 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said:

 

Its Lafferty and Vanecek hopefully.

 

Then MacLean and Uche are back up which would be a normal set up.

 

(As I said Naismith is deeper) 

 

 

Looking at the you tube videos of Vanacek I can’t see him playing alongside Lafferty. His goals are often headers at the end of crosses. Lafferty’s are mostly seizing on chances  through the middle.  Getting Vanacek would suggest he will be the spearhead, and I can’t see Lafferty working in that set up. I like Lafferty and hopes it’s not the case,  but that’s how I see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LeylandJambo
31 minutes ago, iantjambo said:

 

Even if a dog bites you or a bee stings you?

 

:wow:

 

Just remember a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Famous 1874

Lafferty, Vanecek, MacLean and Ikpeazu as striking options is extremely solid. Looking more and more likely that we are going to be playing 2 up front. 

 

Lafferty and Vanecek upfront with Milinkovic and Naismith in behind would be naughty. Then perhaps Olly Lee and Edwards in midfield in front of the back 4 and goalie, a 4222 formation. We could definitely set up like that against majority of the teams then maybe tweak it in the bigger games to have an extra man in midfield. 

Edited by Ali Lawrie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cruyff Turn
9 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said:

 

Its Lafferty and Vanecek hopefully.

 

Then MacLean and Uche are back up which would be a normal set up.

 

(As I said Naismith is deeper) 

Might work with all three of them in a 3-5-2/5-3-2 or 4-4-2 diamond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cruyff Turn
2 minutes ago, scott herbertson said:

 

 

Looking at the you tube videos of Vanacek I can’t see him playing alongside Lafferty. His goals are often headers at the end of crosses. Lafferty’s are mostly seizing on chances  through the middle.  Getting Vanacek would suggest he will be the spearhead, and I can’t see Lafferty working in that set up. I like Lafferty and hopes it’s not the case,  but that’s how I see it

Agree Scott, how I'm reading it to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said:

Can't see how this means Lafferty is away. Naismith was used deeper and we haven't replaced Goncalves. MacLean is back up and Uche is a punt.

 

This would take the squad closer to being better able to challenge. 

Sums up my thoughts to a tee.

 

How adding another striker to a squad that was shockingly short on depth after isma left means lafferty is gone is beyond puzzling. Adding 2+2 and getting 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolute Scenes

I really don't think (or hope!) that lafferty is.away. 

 

I think we are bulking our squad with good players who can all slot in when needed.

 

This would be four experienced strikers, which is good.cover to have. I imagine, if we keep naismith, he would slot in as attacking mid just behind laff and Uche or Laff and Vanecek. He breaks down play really well when there. 

 

Lets keep calm and not panic. It's just another signing to the squad, to build on. Laff loves this club, more than "one last pay day" I feel.  Going to be a dad, last thing he needs or would probably want, is jetting off to start over in China or even England. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolute Scenes
4 minutes ago, Ali Lawrie said:

Lafferty, Vanecek, MacLean and Ikpeazu as striking options is extremely solid. Looking more and more likely that we are going to be playing 2 up front. 

 

Lafferty and Vanecek upfront with Milinkovic and Naismith in behind would be naughty. Then perhaps Olly Lee and Edwards in midfield in front of the back 4 and goalie, a 4222 formation. We could definitely set up like that against majority of the teams then maybe tweak it in the bigger games to have an extra man in midfield. 

 

Attacking four of Laff, Uche/Vanacek, milinkovic and naisy would be pure filth.

 

Derty :sweeet:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, scott herbertson said:

 

 

Looking at the you tube videos of Vanacek I can’t see him playing alongside Lafferty. His goals are often headers at the end of crosses. Lafferty’s are mostly seizing on chances  through the middle.  Getting Vanacek would suggest he will be the spearhead, and I can’t see Lafferty working in that set up. I like Lafferty and hopes it’s not the case,  but that’s how I see it

 

You've no idea whether they can work together. Lafferty is a far more versatile player than your limited description. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolute Scenes
7 minutes ago, mscjambo said:

Sums up my thoughts to a tee.

 

How adding another striker to a squad that was shockingly short on depth after isma left means lafferty is gone is beyond puzzling. Adding 2+2 and getting 5

 

Don't mate, I know.

 

A lot of lady frocks getting soiled on here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A wee Ulster Andy replicate is just what we need.  Fast nippy striker playing off the big man up top. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bazzas right boot
29 minutes ago, Jambojay84 said:

Ok mate my apologies was only being friendly as I thought you were being genuine, back to not posting on here for me I guess 

 

I was saying a taxi for me for getting it wrong. 

 

Apologies. 

 

Cheers for correction ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jambojay84
9 minutes ago, WeeChuck'sHeed said:

 

I was saying a taxi for me for getting it wrong. 

 

Apologies. 

 

Cheers for correction ?

Cool mate but it appears I need :mmtaxi::vrface::gok:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wish jj was my dad
1 hour ago, jambo007 said:

:sweeet:This young man's Wedding tomorrow.....best wishes Dale ...:heartpump:

Good luck to a good lad.

 

With a bit of luck he could have been a big player for us. He really must have been a nightmare to play against.

 

Really hope he catches a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

scott herbertson
2 hours ago, Mikey1874 said:

 

You've no idea whether they can work together. Lafferty is a far more versatile player than your limited description. 

 

 

It's just my opinion. Of course Lafferty does more than that, I was highlighting one of the stronger aspects of his game ( and the apparent strength of Vanacek's) . To be clearer, if there was a choice from the limited video evidence I've seen I'd rather have Lafferty as centre forward than Vanacek,  -  I'm doubtful if they have been bought to work together up front is all I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WoodenHertz
4 hours ago, Cruyff Turn said:

Dario Maresic :wub:

Fantastic young player. Unfortunately recently signed a contract extension keeping him at Sturm Graz till 2020, don't see us being able to afford him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, johnking123 said:

Chines transfer market opens soon. Last pay day for Lafferty. 

 

 

He was getting very decent pay days last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, jambo007 said:

:sweeet:This young man's Wedding tomorrow.....best wishes Dale ...:heartpump:

Aw really, thats nice. He used to come to my restaurant. Lovely folk, hope they have a great day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Lafferty is going his goals kept us in the top 6. Maybe we're changing to 2 up front and Currie could be away on loan since he missed last season and a season as first choice in the championship would do him good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tcjambo said:

I would expect Zanatta to be given a chance with Currie and Keena out on loan again. 

 

Levein has already said he intends to have Keena in the 1st team squad next season

Edited by CAR
misspell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Absolute Scenes said:

I really don't think (or hope!) that lafferty is.away. 

 

I think we are bulking our squad with good players who can all slot in when needed.

 

This would be four experienced strikers, which is good.cover to have. I imagine, if we keep naismith, he would slot in as attacking mid just behind laff and Uche or Laff and Vanecek. He breaks down play really well when there. 

 

Lets keep calm and not panic. It's just another signing to the squad, to build on. Laff loves this club, more than "one last pay day" I feel.  Going to be a dad, last thing he needs or would probably want, is jetting off to start over in China or even England. 

Agree. It's also worth remembering we don't know how good the new players will be or how quickly they'll settle.

 

Having players around like The Duke will help them in many ways if they do have something to offer and improve on. We need to keep our proven, dependable players to count on in these moments. Not lump all the expectation on new signings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are building a squad here, something we never had last season. 

 

Don't know why folk always think someone has to be away because a certain player is coming in.

 

MacLean isn't going to play every game, Ikpeazu is making a huge jump up in level, so probably won't play every game. That leaves Lafferty and, potentially, the Czech boy as first choice. Naismith is more of a number 10 these days and I think he'll definitely be back regardless of how many strikers are brought in.

 

Our squad is threadbare, we need a lot of players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selkirkhmfc1874
Just now, DG_HMFC said:

We are building a squad here, something we never had last season. 

 

Don't know why folk always think someone has to be away because a certain player is coming in.

 

MacLean isn't going to play every game, Ikpeazu is making a huge jump up in level, so probably won't play every game. That leaves Lafferty and, potentially, the Czech boy as first choice. Naismith is more of a number 10 these days and I think he'll definitely be back regardless of how many strikers are brought in.

 

Our squad is threadbare, we need a lot of players.

Exactly, even before the players released this summer we let go Stockton, goncalves, walker and grezlek in January 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pans Jambo
13 hours ago, Adam_the_legend said:

 

Lafferty is great but if we get offered good money for him we won’t turn it down. If we can then use that money to further boost the squad then it work out for the best. 

Thats WAY too sensible. 

 

I’m going to ignore that & say I want KL not only to stay, but to sign an extension. 

 

Why cant we have 4 really good strikers at the club? I seem to recall having 4 garbage strikers at the club at the same time previously. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

letsalldothebeattie
10 minutes ago, DG_HMFC said:

We are building a squad here, something we never had last season. 

 

Don't know why folk always think someone has to be away because a certain player is coming in.

 

MacLean isn't going to play every game, Ikpeazu is making a huge jump up in level, so probably won't play every game. That leaves Lafferty and, potentially, the Czech boy as first choice. Naismith is more of a number 10 these days and I think he'll definitely be back regardless of how many strikers are brought in.

 

Our squad is threadbare, we need a lot of players.

Unless its Sammon on his way out then I think we can all be happy I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TheBigO said:

Not so sure itd mean anything. McLean, who knows, got to think they see a coach in him and hes there when required, solid backup no more type guy.

 

Uche prob on peanuts and a gamble.

 

Naismith i dont think they see as a striker ( a mistake imo).

 

So looking at real number 9s, signing this lad would be real competition to Lafferty with the others to back them up.

 

Currie and Keena you wonder about but again theyre not probably thought of as out and out strikers, more the second in a two.

 

And we might, just might play 2 up too

 

This 100%

but some still seem convinced that Lafferty will be away when Levein has said he wants to keep him and there’s been no offers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr Ian Malcolm

We played the second half of last season with Naismith and Lafferty as our only striking options. We currently have Lafferty, Ikpeazu and MacLean. We're hardly overstocked and needing to shift any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because we look to be singing another striker has nothing to do with lafferty or Naismith staying/coming.

 

Levein just wants options. MacLean isn’t going to start much and Uche is raw.

 

Naismith will play deeper so bring the boy in 

 

logic...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Dr Ian Malcolm said:

We played the second half of last season with Naismith and Lafferty as our only striking options. We currently have Lafferty, Ikpeazu and MacLean. We're hardly overstocked and needing to shift any.

And Sammon, Keena and Currie 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CostaJambo
1 hour ago, tcjambo said:

I would expect Zanatta to be given a chance with Currie and Keena out on loan again. 

Hope Zanatta gets a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil Dunphy
23 minutes ago, ericb said:

And Sammon, Keena and Currie 

 

I cant see us keeping Sammon. Or not loaning out Currie and Keena. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finlay James
24 minutes ago, ericb said:

And Sammon, Keena and Currie 

 

And Henderson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Tenor said:

Already brought in 2 strikers.

 

Lafferty away, or Naismith not coming back?

Post number 2. Wondered how long it would be before someone mentioned Lafferty being off. I know it makes sense but if there was a way to encourage season ticket renewal selling your 17 goal season striker aint it. I sincerely hope this is not the case and, I'd rather keep Naismith if possible rather than sign this fella.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • JKBMod 13 locked this topic
  • cosanostra unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...