ri Alban Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 This piece of filth has just put himself in Prison for 13 months for airing information about a private trial. Haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpruceBringsteen Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Been various brain donors crying about it the last few days on Twitter. Extremely keen on some aspects of the law, not so much on others are those lads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 (edited) On a suspended sentence. Decides to harass lawyers and witnesses at an ongoing trail in an attempt to sway the course of the trial. A more textbook case of contempt of court you will never see. Back in the clink where he belongs, the brain-dead prick. If he doesn't like the laws in this country, he should leave (that's what he and his fans keep saying after all) Edited May 29, 2018 by Cade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Z Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 http://southendnewsnetwork.net/news/thousands-protest-on-the-streets-after-arrest-of-tony-robinson/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Yeah ashamed that I have some brain dead. / thickos on my Facebook who are supported " our tommy"...Horrendous vile little man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 An absolute f4nny, as are his thick followers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iantjambo Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 A complete ****wit of a man. The brain dead of social media are of course all in his corner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 He's a prick, a real nasty piece of work. But I have to ask... What's he actually done? I read that he "admitted contempt of court through publishing information that could prejudice a current trial" but I'm not clear on what exactly that information was. I've also seen it reported that in the Facebook video "he made comments that risked causing a trial to collapse." A post above mentions harassing lawyers and witnesses but I'm not reading that anywhere else - can anyone expand? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chester™ Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 He'll be fine. After all, prison is a bit of a skoosh. You know, X-Boxes, 60 inch telly's, SKY TV and en suite showers in every room... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 We won't be told what he said until the case has been complete, as that would itself be contempt of court. There is a total reporting ban around the case to try and prevent jurors and others being influenced by what they read, hear or see in the media. He was attempting to film defendants as they entered the court, which would have led to them being identified and their families harassed (exactly what happened when the other two Britain First trumpets got chucked in prison) Then the case would have collapsed to due to intimidation of witnesses. "Tommy Robinson" (real name Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon) went from arrest outside the court to being charged, tried, convicted and jailed in 5 hours flat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 (edited) He won't be raising any money for the IRA on the nick. Terrorist sympathising scumbag. Edited May 29, 2018 by Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Dunphy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said: He won't be raising any money for the IRA on the nick. Terrorist sympathising scumbag. Are you sure you’re thinking of the right guy? I can’t stand the prick but he was cutting about Sunderland fighting with Celtic fans last summer, was he not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ri Alban Posted May 29, 2018 Author Share Posted May 29, 2018 Just now, Phil Dunphy said: Are you sure you’re thinking of the right guy? I can’t stand the prick but he was cutting about Sunderland fighting with Celtic fans last summer, was he not? Wrong terrorists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackLadd Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 4 minutes ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said: He won't be raising any money for the IRA on the nick. Terrorist sympathising scumbag. Load of nonsense you posted there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Dunphy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 4 minutes ago, ri Alban said: Wrong terrorists. Made the EDL considered a terrorist organisation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bridge of Djoum Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 8 minutes ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said: He won't be raising any money for the IRA on the nick. Terrorist sympathising scumbag. You're thinking of Anthony Stokes. Robinson belongs on the other side of the political spectrum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Has to be said though, the authorities have done their bit to martyr dicks like Lennon with the way they’ve handled the various grooming cases. Situation is partly of their making. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, New York Fleapit said: You're thinking of Anthony Stokes. Robinson belongs on the other side of the political spectrum. Stephen Lennon? Him & his brother raised money in Luton, for the IRA. The guy is not all he says he is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 7 minutes ago, JackLadd said: Load of nonsense you posted there. Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said: Stephen Lennon? Him & his brother raised money in Luton, for the IRA. The guy is not all he says he is. You’d almost think the guy was thick as shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Never trust anyone who changes their name to " Tommy Robinson" ...Did he have a gang of his followers think that Tommy Robinson was a classic name for a white " straight" English male ?? Maybe he should have called himself Viola D, angelo...or something outrageous...evidences his lack of imagination Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 5 minutes ago, Dusk_Till_Dawn said: You’d almost think the guy was thick as shit He's meant to be quite intelligent. 11 o level passes, apparently. No idea about further education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niblick1874 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 The world is finding out about a publication ban on anything to do with the arrest of someone that was reporting on pedophilia rings. They are finding out about the amount of children involved as well as who are involved in these pedophilia rings. They are finding out the truth. They are astonished that this could happen in Britain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gashauskis9 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 I8hibs will put up bail, he’ll be out soon enough ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackLadd Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 16 minutes ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said: Nope. Can you get any dumber? You know the edl were founded in support of British military after muslims abused a parade in Luton? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 16 minutes ago, Gashauskis9 said: I8hibs will put up bail, he’ll be out soon enough ? LOL ive been waiting for this topic since last Friday, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Governor Tarkin Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 1 hour ago, Cade said: "Tommy Robinson" (real name Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon) went from arrest outside the court to being charged, tried, convicted and jailed in 5 hours flat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Notts1874 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 31 minutes ago, niblick1874 said: The world is finding out about a publication ban on anything to do with the arrest of someone that was reporting on pedophilia rings. They are finding out about the amount of children involved as well as who are involved in these pedophilia rings. They are finding out the truth. They are astonished that this could happen in Britain. Just when I thought you couldn't stoop any lower you have. You do know about the reporting restrictions that are part of English law. Despicable human being.....and I'm not just talking about that lowlife Robinson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niblick1874 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 2 hours ago, ri Alban said: This piece of filth has just put himself in Prison for 13 months for airing information about a private trial. Haha. What is the trial about and why is it private. Just who is the piece of filth here. The one that has put his life on the line trying to show us all what has been going on for years by the likes of those that are on trial, or those that are on trial. Why don't you go and ask the devastated parents of the children who the piece of filth is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niblick1874 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, Notts1874 said: Just when I thought you couldn't stoop any lower you have. You do know about the reporting restrictions that are part of English law. Despicable human being.....and I'm not just talking about that lowlife Robinson. Why not tell me all about the law and how I have, in that post, stooped so low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Notts1874 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 3 minutes ago, niblick1874 said: Why not tell me all about the law and how I have, in that post, stooped so low. Nah. Google it sunshine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 10 minutes ago, niblick1874 said: Why not tell me all about the law and how I have, in that post, stooped so low. Reporting restrictions are a fundamental part of the legal system. They apply in virtually every single case to greater or lesser degree depending on the situation. Hence why child defendants are hardly ever named before conviction and sometimes aren’t identified afterwards. Restrictions apply as soon as someone is formally charged. It isn’t Lennon’s prerogative to just ignore the restrictions that are in place for this case. You can question whether the restrictions in this case are reasonable but quite frankly, I doubt you or anyone else on here listened to the judges rationale so it’s a moot point of discussion anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Dusk_Till_Dawn said: Reporting restrictions are a fundamental part of the legal system. They apply in virtually every single case to greater or lesser degree depending on the situation. Hence why child defendants are hardly ever named before conviction and sometimes aren’t identified afterwards. Restrictions apply as soon as someone is formally charged. It isn’t Lennon’s prerogative to just ignore the restrictions that are in place for this case. You can question whether the restrictions in this case are reasonable but quite frankly, I doubt you or anyone else on here listened to the judges rationale so it’s a moot point of discussion anyway Not to mention the fact Robinson stated the defendants had been charged with a different crime altogether. The eedjit has, if anything, damaged the chance of a conviction with his antics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moogsy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Normthebarman said: Not to mention the fact Robinson stated the defendants had been charged with a different crime altogether. The eedjit has, if anything, damaged the chance of a conviction with his antics. I doubt deep down be really cares about about the outcome of the trial tbh. The man is nothing more than an attention seeking f*ckwit. As are most of his acolytes, on here and in real life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_hmfc Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 23 minutes ago, niblick1874 said: What is the trial about and why is it private. Just who is the piece of filth here. The one that has put his life on the line trying to show us all what has been going on for years by the likes of those that are on trial, or those that are on trial. Why don't you go and ask the devastated parents of the children who the piece of filth is. He's fully aware of the dangers he faces for criticising Islam and the fates that others have met, a majority on here wouldn't dare criticise it in public no matter how extreme some parts are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 14 minutes ago, peter_hmfc said: He's fully aware of the dangers he faces for criticising Islam and the fates that others have met, a majority on here wouldn't dare criticise it in public no matter how extreme some parts are. This isn’t about Islam though. It’s about Asian, and predominantly Pakistani, attitudes to white women. The racial aspect is important but not because a lot of the accused are (probably) Muslims Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, Dusk_Till_Dawn said: This isn’t about Islam though. It’s about Asian, and predominantly Pakistani, attitudes to white women. The racial aspect is important but not because a lot of the accused are (probably) Muslims I think you may find some white men's attitude to women/ girls are not dissimilar. I worked in child protection for years and it was mostly white males who abused women / girls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_hmfc Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, Dusk_Till_Dawn said: This isn’t about Islam though. It’s about Asian, and predominantly Pakistani, attitudes to white women. The racial aspect is important but not because a lot of the accused are (probably) Muslims I was commenting on Tommy Robinson in general. It could be argued though that the Koran gives justification to such acts (sex with children) as the Prophet Mohammed "consumated" his marriage to a 6 year old when she was 9. By the Koran, these people may not consider it a crime at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 (edited) 19 minutes ago, peter_hmfc said: I was commenting on Tommy Robinson in general. It could be argued though that the Koran gives justification to such acts (sex with children) as the Prophet Mohammed "consumated" his marriage to a 6 year old when she was 9. By the Koran, these people may not consider it a crime at all. As far as I'm aware, the Koran states it's OK to have sex with girls if they've reached puberty which is a minimum of 9 years old. Crucially though, it also says sex outwith marriage is a sin. Although someone will probably say that since these girls who were abused weren't Muslims as far as I'm aware, the Koran says they're fair game anyway. I'm not even sure if that's true but like most religious books, there's normally some ****ed up shit that sensible people ignore. Edited May 29, 2018 by Normthebarman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tynietot Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 1 hour ago, JamesM48 said: LOL ive been waiting for this topic since last Friday, Yes it's a great day for freedom, unless you're Tommy Robinson! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_hmfc Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, Normthebarman said: As far as I'm aware, the Koran states it's OK to have sex with girls if they've reached puberty which is a minimum of 9 years old. That just proves my point? 9 years old is fair game? Crucially though, it also says sex outwith marriage is a sin. Okay? Although someone will probably say that since these girls who were abused weren't Muslims as far as I'm aware, the Koran says they're fair game anyway. I'm not even sure if that's true but like most religious books, there's normally some ****ed up shit that sensible people ignore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, peter_hmfc said: I wasn't trying to disprove your point. Backing it up in a way, in fact. The point about sex outside marriage though was that while the Koran has no problem with shagging wee girls, it still prohibits what these men did. So while you could argue it justifies it, it does specifically say it was wrong. Unless the end bit of my post is correct, in which case it does justify it. In which case, it's a stupid book in my opinion. Although I thought that anyway. Edited May 29, 2018 by Normthebarman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_hmfc Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Just now, Normthebarman said: I wasn't trying to disprove your point. Backing it up in a way, in fact. The point about sex outside marriage though was that while the Koran has no problem with shagging wee girls, it still prohibits what these men did. So while you could argue it justifies it, it does specifically say it was wrong. Unless the end bit of my post is correct, in which case it does justify it. In which case, it's a stupid book in my opinion. Although I thought that anyway. Fair point tbh. The second part is , but I think that about most religious books. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 9 minutes ago, tynietot said: Yes it's a great day for freedom, unless you're Tommy Robinson! What don't people understand ? he breached his suspended sentence ? so huckled in the jail right away. It would happen to any citizen. He just has a higher profile than most Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusk_Till_Dawn Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 37 minutes ago, JamesM48 said: I think you may find some white men's attitude to women/ girls are not dissimilar. I worked in child protection for years and it was mostly white males who abused women / girls I get that and what you’re saying is true. But on the specific issue of Asian gangs targeting white women to abuse, the problem was deliberately swept under the carpet for a long time. It does need addressed and it isn’t necessary to qualify every discussion about it by saying ‘white men abuse women too’ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tynietot Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 You've got me wrong Jamesm48. I'm all for the scumbag doing time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Governor Tarkin Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 1 hour ago, niblick1874 said: Why don't you go and ask the devastated parents of the children who the piece of filth is. Two questions. 1. Why should we need to go and ask the parents of the children who the piece of filth is? 2. Why can't you get it into your vacuous skull that in the case of Tommy Robinson Vs The Paedo Beasts, being a piece of shit isn't mutually exclusive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 1 minute ago, tynietot said: You've got me wrong Jamesm48. I'm all for the scumbag doing time. apologies. I mist have misread it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_hmfc Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Just now, Dusk_Till_Dawn said: I get that and what you’re saying is true. But on the specific issue of Asian gangs targeting white women to abuse, the problem was deliberately swept under the carpet for a long time. It does need addressed and it isn’t necessary to qualify every discussion about it by saying ‘white men abuse women too’ I would also say to JamesM48 (and this is in no way a dismissal of the great work he does) that the UK is a majority white, therefore a white man abusing a white girl is not exactly the most unlikely circumstances. I can't remember the exact statistics but it was something like 85% of the grroming crimes were committed by Pakistani men who make up around 2% of the population, and this was based on a frightening number of cases. Someone claimed that 100% of another sex crime (I can't remember which) was done entirely by white males, but it turned out there was only six actual offences. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Governor Tarkin Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 4 minutes ago, Dusk_Till_Dawn said: I get that and what you’re saying is true. But on the specific issue of Asian gangs targeting white women to abuse, the problem was deliberately swept under the carpet for a long time. It does need addressed and it isn’t necessary to qualify every discussion about it by saying ‘white men abuse women too’ Of course it needs addressed, but I'm absolutely positive that Mr Robinson is not the man to lead an objective campaign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.