Walter Bishop Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 According to sky sports news !! Thought it was ?2.3 million? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie-Brown Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 somebody probably just copied down the numbers the wrong way round? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Numrecllay Dyslcixe!!! ....................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Pedro, where are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iaing Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 whether it's 2.3m or 3.2m what will hearts see of that to bring new players in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H.A.N.S Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 whether it's 2.3m or 3.2m what will hearts see of that to bring new players in. Well from the Hartley, Skacel and Gordon sales (?11.6m???) We've seen 500k for Nade and Kingston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest S.U.S.S. Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 whether it's 2.3m or 3.2m what will hearts see of that to bring new players in. 80p? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S2H Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 SSN strikes again. I got in the other saturday having not heard the SCF score, switch on SSN, and the banner along the bottom read Rangers 2 - 3 Queen of the South. Imagine my disappointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Bapswent Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 So when Hearts fork out ?850,000 for Beslija (albeit he is not that good) people are not happy. And also complain when we get a good price for a player because we wont see any of it reinvested? Only at Hearts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 So when Hearts fork out ?850,000 for Beslija (albeit he is not that good) people are not happy. And also complain when we get a good price for a player because we wont see any of it reinvested? Only at Hearts... ???????????????????? People weren't unhappy at spending ?850,000 on a player. People were unhappy at spending ?850,000 on a shiiit player. There is a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Bapswent Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 ???????????????????? People weren't unhappy at spending ?850,000 on a player. People were unhappy at spending ?850,000 on a shiiit player. There is a difference. Which i noted. But my point, which you clearly didnt get, was, that people seem to be moaning about the fact they club will see no money from transfers to spend. But this example, irrespective of quality, shows that that is not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 ???????????????????? People weren't unhappy at spending ?850,000 on a player. People were unhappy at spending ?850,000 on a shiiit player. There is a difference. I was unhappy at a ?850k player who had excelled in a league of equivalent standard as the SPL - if not technically better - being mismanaged to the stage that his motivation was shot, but there you go.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Which i noted. But my point, which you clearly didnt get, was, that people seem to be moaning about the fact they club will see no money from transfers to spend. But this example, irrespective of quality, shows that that is not the case. Clear as mud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cracklin' Rosie Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 i do seem to remember seeing an article (after he scored 12 goals in 12 games) that hearts wanted 3m for him before he even kicked a ball at west brom and mowbrary at the time was like "what the ****?" then he changed his mind to saying that 3m would be a bargain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 So when Hearts fork out ?850,000 for Beslija (albeit he is not that good) people are not happy. And also complain when we get a good price for a player because we wont see any of it reinvested? Only at Hearts... And if we spent a fortune on a player they would complain about the debt and if we spend nothing they complain about not spending on players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allandssmith Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 It's defo ?2.3 million we've been paid for him. Not a bad bit of business as far as I'm concerned! He cost us nothing and scored a few goals in his first season before he got himself injured. He never performed after that though and always looked as though he couldn't be bothered playing! ?2.3 million for the lazy bugger is a good deal IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 It's defo ?2.3 million we've been paid for him. Not a bad bit of business as far as I'm concerned! He cost us nothing and scored a few goals in his first season before he got himself injured. He never performed after that though and always looked as though he couldn't be bothered playing! ?2.3 million for the lazy bugger is a good deal IMO. He cost FBK Kaunas ?500,000. What he cost us remains a mystery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denny Crane Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 The "Peebles Bugle" is claiming Burley has just nabbed Bednar on loan from Kaunas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reiver Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Well from the Hartley, Skacel and Gordon sales (?11.6m???) We've seen 500k for Nade and Kingston Shirley not! That would be suggesting the 4million in "player registrations" may have gone somewhere else... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Merse Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Which i noted. But my point, which you clearly didnt get, was, that people seem to be moaning about the fact they club will see no money from transfers to spend. But this example, irrespective of quality, shows that that is not the case. You've tried to create a point, of which there is very little relevance. The Beslija transfer was 2 and a half years ago! We all know we were spending money back then (poorly), now we're selling off the best talent and not replacing them of anyone near equivalent quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 I think its a good point. I guess its easy to say we have made a profit of 1.8m on him. However, it could be significantly less or I guess more depending on what we paid Kaunas. I would be very annoyed if Kaunas made any money of the guy. However, all those registeration fees have got to be for something. So player purchases such as Bednar would seem the most logical. I have no doubt that FBK Kaunas made a profit from players such as Bednar, Goncalves and Aguiar. It would not surprise me either if it emerged Hearts had to pay FBK Kaunas a fee everytime we are loaned a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7628mm Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 It's defo ?2.3 million we've been paid for him. Not a bad bit of business as far as I'm concerned! He cost us nothing and scored a few goals in his first season before he got himself injured. He never performed after that though and always looked as though he couldn't be bothered playing! ?2.3 million for the lazy bugger is a good deal IMO. You are of course absolutely correct in your summation of him as a lazy bugger He did after all only score 17 goals in 22 starts last season for the baggies http://www.wba.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/0,,10366~1322312,00.html It of course has nothing to do with having some very talented players coming to our club only to be completely wasted by the present regimes bollocks of a method on how they think you run a football club. I say again you are absolutely right that he is a lazy bugger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanF86 Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Oh that's good, another 27p in the transfer kitty then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoked-Glass Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 ???????????????????? People weren't unhappy at spending ?850,000 on a player. People were unhappy at spending ?850,000 on a shiiit player. There is a difference. but he did a good cross against dundee united. That makes up for it does it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.