The White Cockade Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 Dave Lee Roth used to wear it, it radiated pure sexuality. The front three rows often went home pregnant after a gig prove it! My mate's Doctor's Cousin says it ain't so! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 Funny though how no one took on alphas post. Real bad case of double standards from those who believe mainstream. Of course they have no agenda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 It still stands though. The radiation question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 Van halen are shit btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 Thats american rock at its absolute shiteiest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The White Cockade Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 Thats american rock at its absolute shiteiest prove it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maroonlegions Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Funny though how no one took on alphas post. Real bad case of double standards from those who believe mainstream. Of course they have no agenda Has anyone took on the wealth of scientific data from NASA in regards to the Apollo missions?? Not one rebuttal of any part of any NASA scientific paper on the Apollo missions.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Has anyone took on the wealth of scientific data from NASA in regards to the Apollo missions?? Not one rebuttal of any part of any NASA scientific paper on the Apollo missions.. Don't worry ML. I'll rip that post to bits later. Busy at work just now. Pity the CTs don't bother checking it themselves but that's CTs for ye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maroonlegions Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) The photographic validation method presented here is based on the detection of two-dimensional objects among three-dimensional objects, and determining the mutual arrangement of these objects in space and the distance to them by applying a technique known as stereoscopic parallax. BY OLEG OLEYNIK, Ph.D.c Previously of the Department of Physics and Technology Kharkov State University, Ukraine http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax/ Looked a wee bit closer into this chap OLEG I've not the time or inclination to look at the details, but there appears to be no such person as Dr Oleg Oleynik outside this Aulis page and quotes from/references to it. The qualification "Ph. D. c." usually means PhD candidate....which is not quite eth same thing as actually having a PhD. Also the claim that Oleynik has "founded a university"?? Take this... From 1999 to 2012 ? Oleg Oleynik organized non-state research on humanism on the Web, founded a School, a College, and a University with academic degrees. doesn't seem supported by anything from google. There seems nothing actually online from his "research....on the Web" On another Aulis page Oleynik is listed with: Stanislav Pokrovsky, Ph.D Candidate of Technical Sciences, Russia General Director of scientific-manufacturing enterprise Project-D-MSK which seems kind of weird - the article is supposedly written by Mary DM Bennett, so I don't understand why the 2 Russians are mentioned at all. Again there is no evidence for anything by the name of "Project-D-MSK" from a google search beyond Aulis, but Pokrovsky does seem to have a greater online presence than Oleynik - being mentioned in many moon hoax articles for example. It's all made rather irrelevant by the fact the the images have been proven to be correct by the Japanese: 1:20 onwards described how 3D reconstructions from high resolution images exactly match those photos. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings Apollo 15 Photo: Reconstruction from satellite data: The point being it was impossible at the time to know that the scene would look like this without actually going there. More detail: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/05/20080520_kaguya_e.html (http://archive.is/6mtwN) This has been debunked on Apollo Hoax.net. here.. http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=79.0 in short is a very common story: snappy visuals that seem to illustrate an important scientific point, with absolutely no scientific rigor placed behind it. Pseudoscience. He hopes the viewer will be impressed with his ability to distort photographs seemingly at random and make animated GIFs and assume that he got all the rest of it right. Edited September 29, 2017 by maroonlegions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Looked a wee bit closer into this chap OLEG I've not the time or inclination to look at the details, but there appears to be no such person as Dr Oleg Oleynik outside this Aulis page and quotes from/references to it. The qualification "Ph. D. c." usually means PhD candidate....which is not quite eth same thing as actually having a PhD. Also the claim that Oleynik has "founded a university"?? Take this... From 1999 to 2012 ? Oleg Oleynik organized non-state research on humanism on the Web, founded a School, a College, and a University with academic degrees. doesn't seem supported by anything from google. There seems nothing actually online from his "research....on the Web" On another Aulis page Oleynik is listed with: Stanislav Pokrovsky, Ph.D Candidate of Technical Sciences, Russia General Director of scientific-manufacturing enterprise Project-D-MSK which seems kind of weird - the article is supposedly written by Mary DM Bennett, so I don't understand why the 2 Russians are mentioned at all. Again there is no evidence for anything by the name of "Project-D-MSK" from a google search beyond Aulis, but Pokrovsky does seem to have a greater online presence than Oleynik - being mentioned in many moon hoax articles for example. It's all made rather irrelevant by the fact the the images have been proven to be correct by the Japanese: 1:20 onwards described how 3D reconstructions from high resolution images exactly match those photos. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings Apollo 15 Photo: Reconstruction from satellite data: The point being it was impossible at the time to know that the scene would look like this without actually going there. More detail: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/05/20080520_kaguya_e.html (http://archive.is/6mtwN) This has been debunked on Apollo Hoax.net. here.. http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=79.0 in short is a very common story: snappy visuals that seem to illustrate an important scientific point, with absolutely no scientific rigor placed behind it. Pseudoscience. He hopes the viewer will be impressed with his ability to distort photographs seemingly at random and make animated GIFs and assume that he got all the rest of it right. Cheers. Saved me the bother. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Agenda? So you now think they are faked? Are you talking about the post with the photography magic..... sorry science? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk No it wasnt well constructed that post. What was meant was that any news or source other than msm is derided as looking for traffic and money. The last sentence was sarcasm relating to mainstream. Had a few yesterday. Think one or two posts were a bit skoowiff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 No it wasnt well constructed that post. What was meant was that any news or source other than msm is derided as looking for traffic and money. The last sentence was sarcasm relating to mainstream. Had a few yesterday. Think one or two posts were a bit skoowiff. So Jake. You keep on posting and asking questions. But you don't seem to accept the answers. Maybe it's time for you to pay back for the efforts all are making on this thread to help you. Are the LRO photos fake? The Japanese topography evidence posted by MlL. Are the Japanese lying also? Come on now. It's your turn to make your case for Apollo being faked. To everyone else - he won't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maroonlegions Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Cheers. Saved me the bother. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 So Jake. You keep on posting and asking questions. But you don't seem to accept the answers. Maybe it's time for you to pay back for the efforts all are making on this thread to help you. Are the LRO photos fake? The Japanese topography evidence posted by MlL. Are the Japanese lying also? Come on now. It's your turn to make your case for Apollo being faked. To everyone else - he won't. Deeside. I accept that the proof you and ML have provided means we went to the moon. Everyone else . Naw it disnae. Maroon Legions I have informed the rest of the tinfoil hat club about your treacherous posts. Just watch yersel . We are very angry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Deeside. I accept that the proof you and ML have provided means we went to the moon. Everyone else . Naw it disnae. Maroon Legions I have informed the rest of the tinfoil hat club about your treacherous posts. Just watch yersel . We are very angry. so Jake, Are the LRO photos fake? Are the Japanese photos fake? It will help everyone to know your position on this and your explanation as to how the "fakery" was done and why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 so Jake, Are the LRO photos fake? Are the Japanese photos fake? It will help everyone to know your position on this and your explanation as to how the "fakery" was done and why. My position on this tbf has not really been knowledgeable . There were questions i asked which others like yourself had covered. Everything ive read fom you and the traitor (hee hee) seems to be on the ball. I cant argue with you buddy as much as i enjoy an argument necause you would run rings round me. Im not a cter as a default position . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 Worth a watch with some funny takes on things. Not really an eyeopener but I think most of us realise by now that we are lied to a lot. Enjoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo 1874 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 On 01/03/2018 at 15:56, jake said: Worth a watch with some funny takes on things. Not really an eyeopener but I think most of us realise by now that we are lied to a lot. Enjoy Scary that mate 👍. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Internet Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Birds don't exist. Look it up. Stay woke and thank me later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo 1874 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 4 minutes ago, Mauricio Pinilla said: Birds don't exist. Look it up. Stay woke and thank me later. You don't believe that mate do you? 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Internet Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 3 minutes ago, Bongo 1874 said: You don't believe that mate do you? 😂 Obviously not but I really want to by far my favourite conspiracy theory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ehllhayapeh Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 On 28/09/2017 at 12:14, maroonlegions said: Well I have a question for those still peddling the "hoax" hypothesis. You have been giving links that show that NASA did have the rocket technology to do it. You have been given links that show all the calculations on how to keep a human alive in space. You have been given links that show space photos of the earth that match the photos that were taken from Apollo. You have been give links that show the testimony of the people who went to the moon and the people who worked to get them there. You have had plenty opportunities to visit these links that provide the evidence that debunks all the so called evidence you are using to justify the hoax claim,from why the "flag" on the moon remained straight and also how the Apollo craft got through the Van Allen radiation belt. But you have religiously rejected all of this as being faked photographs, paid witnesses, staged events ect,ect,ect.. The question is this ,what evidence would you require that would finally convince you to accept that the Apollo missions were real?? If photographs , scientific explanations, eyewitness accounts, and moon rocks are not sufficient evidence, then what is?? Aye but David Icke says Stanley Kubrick was paid to fake it for NASA so that clearly voids all your research 😀 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maroonlegions Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 14 hours ago, Ehllhayapeh said: Aye but David Icke says Stanley Kubrick was paid to fake it for NASA so that clearly voids all your research 😀 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Mackerel Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 My tinfoil hat, next door, black cab driving neighbour thinks its a lot of shite too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ri Alban Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 Lakers v Kings, game 6 of the 2002 western conference final. The kings were 3-2 up on the Threepeat chasing NBA darlings, the Los Angeles Lakers. Any basketball fans on here? What do you think? Were the Kings stitched up? Seems an awful lot of free throws were giving to the Lakers(40) when they had averaged only 23 in the other 5 games. And the Kings had a few players foul themselves out of the game. Would a Kings v Nets WS be that bad they had to con the Kings out for the Lakers to take 3 in a row. I think they were! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.